Editor's Note: The information in this Part 2 is not for everyone. When it was originally transmitted, during many months following the initial contact, the witness was carefully instructed not to release any of it until he was given the time. As the first part of this edition of this book, the original contact story, was being typeset for printing, the Iargans re-contacted the witness and authorized him to release the second manuscript printed here as Part 2 of this book, which you are now about to read. Only those who are ready will understand. The others will find this uninteresting to them and will not continue reading it.
During the first visit aboard the spacecraft the witness was given some kind of conditioning which made him receptive to sights and sounds, something like the way it was done mechanically aboard the ship, and after that the Iargans could "tune him in" and transmit sounds and images with what seemed like 3-dimensional reality. The contacts continued and hundreds of pages of notes, sketches, and diagrams were made. These are collected in this section on Iargan philosophy.
These notes describe the origin of the Universe, both non-physical and physical, ours and theirs, and the origin and development of both spiritual and physical rational creatures, and how they are influenced. They also discuss the plurality of life and the great variety of intelligent creatures in this vast universe and their purpose.
THE COSMIC INTEGRATION OF EARTH
This information was handed over by the crew of an Iargan spaceship with the intention to lift the cosmic isolation of humanity.
The great improbability: Proof of God's existence.
As I have said, the aim of this presentation is to break open the
Earth's isolation. Isolation does not only mean the absence of
contact with other intelligent beings, but also the ignorance
surrounding the Creator and the goal of His creation. Our
ignorance in this is an essential part of the great plan.
The idea of breaking our isolation can only be entertained
when we are "knowledgeable" and this means that denial of God's
existence must have practically vanished from this earth.
Atheism is just ignorance according to them.
With this in mind, they dictated this first chapter as a
direct or indirect proof that this universe is the almighty
manifestation of an endless, and impersonal, creative intellect.
At first, I saw the remarkable idea of proving God's
existence as a sort of curiosity, to be accepted for what it was
worth; later, it became clear to me that this is a basic
requirement for understanding of the further information. The
destruction of Atheism is an important part of the plan of
creation, because it would hinder the progress of humanity in the
I am certain that many people will now close this book and
consign me to the ranks of the certified madmen; I would have
done the same in their place. This does not restrain me from
honestly warning my readers of the aims of this story to prevent
them from feeling that they have been manipulated.
A very different question is, have I reached my aim? It must
be quite obvious that a "coincidental" layman (sailor) cannot be
expected to formulate scientific proof of the existence of God,
even if he does have access to all the relevant information. Experts who have commented on the manuscript, have proved by the results of a logic test that no direct proof of God has been given; for one reason, that the story contains certain unproven axioms. I have rejected their offers of help in filling in the empty spaces because I feel that I must relay the information in its purest form, without any personal interpretations. It is also possible that the logic of an alien
race is different from ours.
I will wait and see if their prophesies are correct that our scientists will quickly react to the newly released knowledge of the structure of the immaterial consciousness of matter and energy. We stand on the eve of the discovery of a new series of natural laws, with far-reaching consequences.
Matter is nothing more than the "filling" of the later described "spiritual reality." Knowledge of this structure leads to an exceptional power of manipulation of matter and energy; and also of the human mind. The true nature of a side-effect of this fact will then become clear, gravity; it is then fairly simple to neutralize it. We will then have "UFO" type aircraft flying around, powered by an anti-gravity vibrator and supported by the ground-echo of an anti-gravity ray. These sort of "proofs" will demonstrate the structure of the matter-consciousness and provide the direct proof of the existence of God. This knowledge contains a built-in "trigger," if I should fail to prove my argument, which is highly possible, the "trigger" will activate certain scientists or inventors to discover these secrets. The schedules are complete, it all sounds too fantastic to be true, but we will be there within the next few years; just wait and see.
The question remains, to what extent will this prove to be an indirect proof of the existence of God.
What other theories can be offered to logically explain all the wonders between heaven and earth, but which do not have the basis of a creative intellect. They argue that it is impossible. To humans, the plan of creation realizes a complete impossibility. The plan is so complex and genial, that no human could ever have thought of it. Knowledge of it can only be obtained at the source, nobody could offer an alternative plan that is logical and yet deny the almighty intellect as the starting point. I have no more worries on this point, but the debate will have to prove it.
My advice to the reader in this is to ignore the question of proof. Their story of the creation is not easy to understand, but it is neat and tidy. The story is complete and logical to those who will read it critically but without prejudice. It tells everything, even the closest kept secrets of the universe, and the truth is so plain to see that many will no longer require any proof.
This entire communication was transmitted in Holland Dutch language in terms and mind symbols familiar to the witness. All terms for Deity may be considered one aspect of polarity. All terms for Lucifer and Satan represent the necessary other aspect and may not be exactly what the reader was taught in catechism.
I think it may be useful to begin with a short summary of our conceptions of the size and origin of the universe. The size and extent are gigantic; outside our milky-way, that contains about two hundred-billion stars, we see other star systems, billions of them, each containing billions of stars. The more our telescopes improve, the more stars we discover and the greater the distance at which we discover still more stars, billions of light-years away from us. The number of stars must be many more than a billion times a billion, and the end is still not in sight. The space that we can see has a diameter of roughly twenty billion light-years while light travels at a speed of three hundred thousand kilometres per second. The size of the universe is so far beyond our powers of understanding that it alienates us. It seems ridiculous to suggest that all this has no purpose.
At the limits of our optical observations, we see star systems rushing away from us at impossible speeds, up to half the speed of light.
This can only mean that we live in an expanding universe. This expansion can be explained back to a start in which all matter was confined in one clearly defined area. The expansion is assumed to have begun here, some thirteen billion years ago, with a primeval explosion, the big bang. According to this theory, the universe must have had a beginning.
Disregarding the question of the truth of this theory, the intriguing fact of a beginning remains, we arrive at the same theory from the calculations of the age of stars. Many astronomers and scientists seriously take into account that the universe "originated" at some particular moment. As long as we do not know how this happened, we can only accept this as a reasonable assumption.
THE GREAT AXIOM
To get down to business, the Iargan creation story begins roughly
at this point, the origin. Their explanation rests on one GREAT
AXIOM: Something can NOT be created from nothing. At first, this
seems to be perfectly logical, but we come to a problem when we
substitute the word "universe" for something, we have no choice
but to give that it does exist, it was "created."
Quite honestly, it would seem to me to be ridiculous to
accept the idea that matter has always existed, ad infinitum: but
for the good order of things, I must prove it here.
This proof begins with three related arguments:
1. An infinite quantity of matter would completely fill space,
so energy and matter must be finite.
2. When one characteristic of something is finite, then all its
characteristics must be finite. Matter is then finite in all
respects; speed, quantity, distance, etc.
3. Time as the counterpart of matter is therefore finite; even
if it should continue forever.
The last statement requires some explanation; time exists by
the grace of matter, and is defined as the propagation of the
vibration in the force-field of an atom. (see Appendix)
Time is therefore bound by a finite speed, the repetition of
finite events, popularly compared to the ticking of a clock. No
matter how many millions of years a clock should continue
ticking, the result will never be infinite, in other words, even
the eternal continuance of finite events never results in
infinity. Even after millions of years, not one second of
eternity would have passed. Unlimited continuance can never
become infinite. From these three arguments we conclude that
time matter, and energy had a beginning and were therefore
What could have been the origin of the gigantic quantity of
matter and energy that exists in the universe? Could it have come
from the void?
The answer we get from their standpoint is:
Axiom: Something can never be created from nothing.
Submission: The universe was created.
First conclusion: the creation is nothing more or less
than the mutation of what already existed.
The conclusion is logical and simple but it is worth a lot
of critical thought, because from we obtain the equally logical
and simple, irrefutable, proof of the existence of God. This
argument can be upheld by proving that the "nothing" never
existed, and that the "already existing" has always existed.
What can we say about the "already existing" before the creation?
Second statement: If ever in the; past the total "nothing" had
existed, it would have been permanent.
Submission: The total "nothing" was not permanent.
Second conclusion: The "already existing" has always existed and
is infinite in time; the total "nothing" has never existed.
It then seems that the "already existing" is the same as the
"eternal". It has always existed, and will continue to exist,
without a beginning and without an end.
The second conclusion does not substantiate the axiom because
it is derived from it. The substantiation will have to be found
by another approach that does not begin by the existence of the
This original form of all that now exists is therefore
indestructible; it does not age and it does not change, it is
absolute. In future, the "already existing" will be referred to
as the ABSOLUTE.
Third statement: The ABSOLUTE is infinite in time (see second
Submission: Time can never be infinite because it is a limited
Third conclusion: Then the definition of time in the ABSOLUTE is
different form our definition of time.
Actually, we could have known this because the ABSOLUTE is the
original form of all existence, also of time. In other words,
eternity is not the eternal continuance of our time, but a
completely different kind of time.
Defitions of the infinite.
The conclusion that the ABSOLUTE exists in infinite time
introduces the concept of infinity. Here we come across the
problem that many people are so used to the mathematical meaning
of the term infinity, that they have the greatest difficulty in
thinking in terms of the ABSOLUTE infinity. The latter is an
existential infinity, the endlessness of being, or THE being,
that encompasses all consciousness, all intelligence, and all
creativity. Due to the fact that Earthly sciences almost
exclusively use the mathematical abstraction, I will only use the
term when it can be mathematically justified.
1. One fundamental quality of the infinite is that it is
indivisible; division results in finiteness.
2. To make it clear that existential infinity is a totality, and
therefore also contains the finite, we can make use of a
mathematical comparison using the progression of that number.
As soon as one progression is infinite, it contains every
progression of every finite number, no matter how large this may
be. The infinite therefore contains all the possibilities of any
progression. This argument stems from the illimitability of the
infinite and is therefore also valid for values other than
numbers. It then follows that infinity encompasses all finite
possibilities in an infinite progression.
3. The existential infinity is indivisible and contains all
possibilities; it is therefore ONE infinity, and never more.
4. Mathematically: As soon as the power of a number (through the
progression) becomes endless, all the powers become endless.
Existential: As soon as it is proved that one possibility or
property of anything is infinite, then all the properties are
infinite because it is then unbounded.
Fourth statement: When one property of something is infinite,
then all the properties are infinite, and it is indivisible.
Submission: The ABSOLUTE exists in infinite time.
Fourth conclusion: Then the ABSOLUTE is infinite in all
respects and is the infinite origin of all existence; the
The existence of unlimited possibilities.
They thus argued that the universe was nothing more that mutation
of the infinite ABSOLUTE. The question then arises was this
creation the only possible mutation of the ABSOLUTE?
Fifth statement: The ABSOLUTE contained ALL possibilities for
mutation because it was unbounded.
Submission: The universe is only ONE of the many possible
appearances of the ABSOLUTE.
Fifth conclusion: The present creation is then just ONE of, an
unlimited number of other possibilities. The ABSOLUTE is then
almighty, and was capable of many other creations.
Now that the ALL-mighty has been mentioned, it is interesting
to ask if the ABSOLUTE can be called the creator of the universe.
After the definitions of infinity, the answer becomes easy.
Sixth statement: The ABSOLUTE possessed ALL possibilities, and
therefore, at least all the possibilities that exist now.
Submission: Humans possess the possibilities of conscious
thought, intelligence, personality, and creativity.
Sixth conclusion: The ABSOLUTE possessed an infinite,
all-encompassing consciousness with an infinite intelligence; an
infinite number of ego possibilities, and with an infinite
almighty creative power that was bound into the indivisible unity
of the infinity, the infinite, almighty ALL-consciousness, the
Creator. This explains the existence of the one almighty Creator
of the universe as clearly as possible.
The axiom is still acceptable but not proved; something
cannot be created from nothing. Only when this has been
demonstrated beyond a doubt can there be talk of proof.
The infinity of the NOTHING
Seventh statement: The ALL-consciousness contained ALL
possibilities and was indivisible.
Submission: The non-existing, or the "nothing" is also a
Seventh conclusion: Then the ALL-consciousness also possessed the
possibility of the NOTHING and the ALL is also the NOTHING.
Then ALL and NOTHING must be an indivisible unity.
It is clear that this conclusion leads us into a fogbank
where we are in danger of loosing our senses of order and logic.
Are we guilty of a serious fault in our thinking? Does NOTHING
qualify as infinite?
More's the pity, it does. The NOTHING is the complete,
boundless dark emptiness that has no end. It is also the only
eternity that we are able to imagine; nothing, the endless void,
no speck of dust, no glimmer of light, no movement, no ageing,
no change; indivisible nothing.
Nothing with which to judge time. Can time exist in complete
emptiness? Time is movement, and without movement there can be
no time, although the possibility for time did exist. If one
small movement had taken place, time would have been created.
Then the difference between our time and absolute time is that
the all consciousness was not limited by time, was timeless and
motionless, but contained the possibility for time.
In other words, the nothing complies with the requirements
of the absolute as we have defined them. It is infinite in all
respects and exists in infinite time. This confirms the seventh
conclusion, that is clear.
What is not so clear is what we have achieved with this
conclusion. On the one hand the ABSOLUTE is EVERYTHING, and on
the other hand, it is NOTHING. At first sight an impossible
conclusion, because it may mean that the creation did take place
The omnipotence of the infinite nothing.
How can THE ALL, under which our universe falls, at the same time
The brain work needed to answer this question has already
been done. This is only possible when the ALL consists of pure
contradictions, or, put another way, when it is composed of
counteracting principles that leave the inviolate NOTHING intact.
These principles can be regarded as the plus and minus of an
electrical charge or the north and south pole of a magnet. For
example, our universe must have an opposite in the form of a
second universe in which matter is polarized exactly opposite,
the anti-matter, that exists "somewhere". The existence of
parallel worlds is explained in the other book. With this, we
have discovered an important limitation of the ALL. It is
certainly everything, but only by virtue of exact opposites that
are integrally zero. To anyone thinking deeply over this, it soon
becomes clear that the NOTHING has the upper hand in this game
of possibilities. Everything in the ALL-consciousness was bound
by the iron law of the cosmos, that everything must exist out of
opposites, for the sake of the NOTHING. The NOTHING is then the
origin of the infinity.
With this conclusion, the pieces of the puzzle begin to fall
into place. Everything becomes clear when we turn the thing
around and begin with the origin, the NOTHING.
Before the creation existed, NOTHING. The only difference
being that the word means something other than what we usually
think of in this context, this is why I use capitals. The NOTHING
is infinite, and the infinite contains the ALL, the
ALL-consciousness, but only so long as it exists out of absolute
counteractions. The inevitable consequence of the endless dark
emptiness was that it contained an almighty intellect. The
endless nothing is the origin of the omnipotence of the
ALL-consciousness, and this last is the power of the infinite
Statement 1.Prior to the creation was the infinite NOTHING.
Statement 2.The infinite obviously contained all possibilities,
Statement 3.The NOTHING could only contain counteracting
principles or contradictions that integrally amounted to nothing
Statement 4.Then the NOTHING is the ALL that is composed of
Statement 5.The ALL had the ability to create the present
universe as long as it existed out of contradictions that left
the original infinity of the NOTHING unchanged.
Conclusion: The total NOTHING in the axiom has never existed, and
with this, the axiom is proved.
The "REALLY EXISTING"
The question now arises, to what extent is it possible to regard
contradictions that amount to zero, as something or nothing? With
this, we can discuss the first conclusion to the axiom, and
approach it in a different way.
Axiom: Something can never be created from nothing.
Submission: The universe exists.
Conclusion: Then for all intents and purposes, the universe is
This Conclusion is also completely valid, the ALL and the NOTHING
are identical, but this does not invalidate the first conclusion.
The "Something" in the axiom is undoubtedly the matter, time, and
energy in the universe; and this is undoubtedly the mutation of
something that always existed.
In the last conclusion, our universe, which is bound by a
time-synchronisation field to an anti-universe, is viewed from
the point of the timeless infinity. From this point of view, the
counterbalanced creation is indeed the NOTHING; but for those who
live in one universe, the other anti-universe is not relevant.
For the ALL-consciousness, this creation was nothing more
that the mutation of the ABSOLUTE counteracting principle, a
mutation of the NOTHING, because the ALL was the NOTHING, the not
Absolute opposites are, and remain, NOTHING. Only when the
contradictions are resolved and are no longer tied to each other
as opposite poles of a magnet, can the NOTHING become reality.
The aim of the creation is the abolition of the many
contradictions through which the "REALLY EXISTING" will come into
being. The axiom of the creation is therefore different when
viewed by the ALL-consciousness; SOMETHING can be created from
NOTHING. This means exactly the same as The "REALLY ~EXISTING"
can be created from ALL. Zero and infinity are always the same
With these additions, the proof of the existence of GOD has
been demonstrated. It is true that the almighty Creator of the
universe will change into the "REALLY EXISTING" GOD, but this is
of little importance, because GOD has the pure identity of the
The meditating infinite.
Now it becomes interesting to get to know something about the
being of the infinite ALL-consciousness. How do we cope with the
thought of an almighty consciousness that was the immutable ALL;
and that existed, timeless and immobile in the infinite dark
emptiness. It doesn't sound very attractive.
Can such a thing think? It encompasses all possibilities in
their original form, also thought. How should we visualize this?
The answer that logic dictates is perfectly clear. Thought is
deduction, combination, and change, because it adds new thoughts
to the ones that already exist. The infinite was immutable,
therefore it could not think. An impossible conclusion when
associated with a creative intellect.
Can we reconcile this? We can. The addition of new thoughts
to the ALL-consciousness was not possible because IT already
contained ALL thought in an infinite thought sequence. IT
contained ALL possibilities, and no new possibilities could be
added, ever. The ALL-consciousness, could therefore not think.
Now we are on the right track; the AL~consciousness did not
need to think. IT was above thought because IT knew ALL thought
in ALL time, also in the future.
How can a finite thought exist in the infinite? Exactly the
same way as a finite number can exist in an endless progression.
The flow of thought existed continuously in ALL time, through an
infinite number of time directions from the past to the future
at an infinite time velocity.
The previous explanation simplifies the description of the
infinite, to time standing still, without mentioning the fact
that time can only stand still as a result of opposites in time
speed and direction. In the infinite, the time moved at infinite
speed in ALL possible directions from past to future and back
again. ALL time existed simultaneously. This situation can be
compared to a weight flying around in a circle at the end of a
piece of string; if the weight should reach (theoretically)
infinite speed, it would be at ALL points of the circle at the
same time. At any given point, the weight is always present, this
symbolizes the infinite flow of thought that continually exists
at every moment. So can infinite time be approached in two ways,
from nil immobile "no time" and from infinite, mobile "ALL-time"
from which the resultant time speed is nil, caused by the pure
counteraction this ALL-time is in fact the omni-directional and
omni-present time that we shall call "omni-time" (eternity).
Every quality of the ALL-consciousness must be regarded in this
way, as infinite, by which every thought continually existed
through the infinite speed of time. Therefore, ALL thoughts in
ALL possible futures existed, and are indestructible because they
already existed "in the future." This is the law of the
conservation of knowledge which extends to cover ALL the
qualities of the ALL-consciousness. It has existed for ALL time.
Through the indestructibility of ALL thought, the
ALL-consciousness had an infallible memory system, the infinite,
immutable, perfect knowledge. It knew ALL the mutations of ALL
the possibilities, in ALL time and to the utmost consequences.
It had an infinite intelligence, because IT knew the answer of
any question that could ever be asked.
Every human was also known.
The ALL-consciousness knew ALL thoughts in ALL time, therefore
also in our time. Then every human thought, no matter how simple,
was also known. The arguments are simple, but the answer is
Then every human and every footstep was known, and chance
does not exist, at least, not for the infinite ALL-consciousness.
On the other hand, it is perfectly logical that the creator of
the time should know the future. Time exists through
counteractions, and is the not really existing. Further, it is
just as logical that ALL-might (might of the ALL) and
ALL-knowledge (knowledge of the ALL) go together. An almighty
consciousness obviously knows what IT will know. The same kind
of conclusion can be reached with regard to our own identity. The
ALL-consciousness contained ALL the possibilities of
ego-identities that were bound by the laws of the infinite into
unity which existed eternally and was indestructible.
Then comes the question, ALL identity, so the human too? Why
not? There was only one ALL-CONCIOUSNESS that contained ALL
identities. The present human ego can only be a mutation of what
already existed. The primeval form of our consciousness and our
ego was a part of the ALL-consciousness and has always existed,
and is indestructible. The Godly nucleus of our ego took part in
the almighty creation that caused our universe to come into
being. This makes us unknowing gods that had the perfect
knowledge, but the obliteration of our memory is so complete that
our "conscience" had no more factual knowledge. This conclusion
is hopeful. If we took part in the creation process, not as
spectators, but as an essential part of the creative
consciousness of the creative unity, then it is impossible that
we now live a purposeless life. On the contrary, our existence
must have a purpose with great importance, but also with great
risks. No freedom without risks.
An undefined consciousness.
From this contour sketch of the NOTHING, an imposing silhouette
appears from the endless dark emptiness. An infinite
consciousness that was capable of any creation. IT could choose
from an unlimited number of possibilities, whatever IT wanted,
IT enclosed in IT-self, tens of thousands of possibilities
of creations equal to ours, with ALL the thoughts, knowledge, and
experience connected to them. IT saw through ALL time, knew every
future, and every being in every detail.
The ALL-knowledge is inconceivable.
The completeness is the most impressive aspect of this existence,
but the aspects of infinity are easier to reason. This comes from
the infinity of time in which finite values exist indefinitely,
continuing in OMNI-time, eternal and indestructible. It is the
factor through which the finite becomes infinite, the condition
for existence in the NOTHING, next to the condition of
The ALL-consciousness was unlimited in its possibilities, and
therefore also UNDEFINED. ALL was still an hypothesis with
infinite probability. It was and it was not. And yet it was the
irrefutable reality from which the whole universe was created,
but it was not, because it had not manifested IT-self in
anything. The choice had not be~ made, only the consciousness
WAS. It was unbounded in time, and therefore there was no sense
of time. It was unlimited in its possibilities of identity, so
equally, there was no sense of ego. The character and nature were
also not defined.
The spirit, the intelligence and the knowledge, was defined.
The spirit of ALL-knowledge was perfect, but the being was not
yet defined. Through this, it was determined WHO would use the
spirit. Who was the ALL-consciousness before the mutation?
It was nobody!
Through this, the NOTHING had terrifying possibilities with
unfathomable risks. IT could produce the most loving, noble and
attractive or the cruellest, ugliest monster that surpasses human
imagination. This consciousness of the nothing existed of
contradictions, both results were possible. The possibilities
were unlimited, what would emerge from the endless dark
emptiness; and with what purpose?
A temporary universe.
After this exploration of the basic conditions, we can make a
cautious start with the story of the creation. By one means or
another, the ALL-consciousness underwent a miraculous change that
we now see as the creation. This change was complex in extremes,
and I have therefore split the story into three sections, each
of which describe a part of the complexity. The following part
of this chapter gives a description of the manipulations that
were necessary for the change.
The second chapter deals with the changes in consciousness,
and the book of physics explains the physical aspects of the
creation mechanism with a description of the infinitely strong
three-dimensional vibration field, the Cosmic Unified Field.
The infinity of the ALL-consciousness was a great problem by
the creation, at least for us to be able to understand it. There
is simply nothing to begin with. It is immutable, indivisible,
infinite, indestructible; nothing can be added, nothing new can
exist, etc, etc. It just IS, immovable, ponderous, immobile. It
is the eternal, immutable hypothesis with infinite probability.
How was it possible that this could ever change?
Statement: The infinite is unchangeable, only the finite is
Submission: The change did take place.
Conclusion: Then the infinity must have been lifted or blocked;
a possibility that must always have existed.
Here we come across the concept of "bounding" or the
limitation of the infinite. I have already explained that the
"common factor" for the existence of finite values in infinity,
must be sought in the undetermined infinity of the time. The
bounds were therefore first laid on the time. In my book, the
phenomenon creation is always regarded as the limitation of time,
even though it can be explained by other means. As soon as one
feature of anything becomes finite, ALL its features become
finite; it is therefore not necessary to use more than one to
illustrate the explanation. The limitation of the infinite
timespeed and the time direction was enough to limit the
The problem with finite time is that it cannot exist on its
own. Time is the progress of the vibration in the force field of
an atom, and is a result of matter. Inertia creates finite time.
Matter and energy had to exist in order to bound the infinite
NOTHING, and at the same moment, the dimensions of time and space
came into being. It would appear that the creation of matter was
only necessary to limit the infinite in order to change it, and
that this was necessary for the creation of the really existing
in the future (the resolution of the contradiction).
This is precisely the aim of the creation of matter. It is
a temporary means of creating the really existing. We can now
divide the creation process into two separate actions; the
dissolution of the immutable, and the real change.
In this chapter, we will only discuss the principles of the
limitation; the working of these principles, with among other
things, the time synchronization, will be explained in the
1.The limitation came about through the creation of matter and
2.The infinite was indivisible. It was therefore impossible to
limit only a part of the ALL-consciousness, it had to be
3.The infinite was timeless, therefore it could not be
temporarily limited; it had to be for ever. It was also
impossible to phase the limitation.
Conclusion: The limitation of the ALL-consciousness was unique,
total, and irrevocable.
Let's take the next step.
How does the principle of the limitation work? How, and by whom
can the infinite be limited?
A rather wanting example may serve to clarify the matter. Imagine
an object moving at infinite speed. Physics tells us that no
matter how much effort is applied to brake the object, its speed
will always be infinite. Only when it is braked with an infinite
power, will the result be a finite speed.
The braking would generate a gigantic amount of energy. The
braking of the infinite time speed of the ALL, produced a
gigantic amount of energy. This example brings us to the
1.The infinite(speed) can only be limited by another infinite
2.Only one infinite existed, so it could only be limited by
IT-self. Then follows that the other infinity must have come from
the first one, but could not have been a part of the first, or
it would never have been "the other".
3.The possibility of this other infinity must have existed in the
ALL-consciousness (immutable) which means that it existed of
contradictions. Then the counteracting ALL-consciousness limited
IT-self by a contradicting infinite power or force field. (see
book of the physics of the carrier field)
4.The limitation came about because the infinity of the ALL-
consciousness transformed IT-self into the other infinity of the
limiting force field whereby two infinities have never existed
together, no more than no infinity (indestructible). A sudden
infinity transmutation must have taken place where just as
suddenly, ALL matter and energy, together with time and space
dimensions, must have come into being.
5. The energy came from the limitation, and may therefore be
referred to as the limitation energy.
The point of ALL this is the other infinite that limited the
infinity of the ALL. It could not have been a part of the first
infinite, because then it would have been limited along with it,
and no longer been infinite. This was impossible because the
infinite was causal and indestructable (has existed through ALL
The cause of the limitation.
This other infinity can be discussed in still another way. The
lightening creation was a necessary condition in attaining the
mutability of the ALL-consciousness. The actual change was still
to come, of necessity, after the limitation. The goal of creation
must then be something that is finite and limited.
The conclusion is simple; if the goal is finite, it could not
have existed in the infinite, and it must be SOMETHING new. This
seems to be an unnecessary conclusion; it would be foolish to
imagine that this creation was only a repetition of what already
existed, but on the other hand, something new would be a
violation of the immutability.
How could something new exist in the infinite?
The answer is simple, the infinite contained everything, every
possible (and for us impossible) mutation of anything; and
therefore it must have been capable of many different creations,
each with something new that of necessity could not exist in the
infinite. What conditions were imposed on the goal of this
The infinite ALL was composed of contradictions that left the
essential infinity of the NOTHING intact. ALL possibilities were
integrally NOTHING, or not really existing. Was there then no
single possibility that really existed?
Certainly, there was one thing that really existed, and that was
the NOTHING which blocked the contradictions, the basic and
dominant feature of the ALL. Through the immutability of the
NOTHING, the REALLY EXISTING had no chance to manifest. Only the
manifestation of one of the existing possibilities to be REALLY
EXISTING could negate the immutability of the NOTHING. On the
other hand we have the fact that the SOMETHING could not exist
in the infinity because it had to be bound to time and limits.
It seems that we have faultlessly demonstrated that the creation
was impossible. The reasoning is perfect, but the conclusion that
this leads to an impossibility, is wrong.
1. The aim to create SOMETHING, the reality, was the motivation
of the will of the ALL-consciousness; but it was not a wish with
uncertain consequences as we have.
2. The almighty, intelligent objective of the ALL: The Word,
created the time and therefore determined ALL future events;
including the goal.
Conclusion: The almighty Word contained the goal of the creation
in IT-self, and the Word was the opposite of the NOTHING. The
Word was the reality SOMETHING that created the time at the
moment of the limitation and thereby the SOMETHING became
definite. The time plays no role in the infinite, it is composed
of contradictions and does not really exist.
From the King James Version of the Christian Bible
John 1. "in the beginning was the Word" (and nothing else).
The goal of the creation was unique and irrevocable, and was as
such, again immutable. This had to be so because the goal
contained the other infinity that limited the first, and the laws
of the infinite are valid for the new infinity. It is again
immutable. The irrevocability of the goal caused an extra
complication, it had to be valid not only for the infinite, but
also for the finite. In fact, the real goal could only originate
in the finite. The ALL had to create consciousness contradictions
in the infinite, and reconcile them in the finite.
The Word may therefore be compared to a computer program
which is used to regulate a process and must remain valid for the
complete process. The process and the program both demand that
the creativity of the programmer be accomplished before the
process begins (creation in advance).
Which contradictions had to be revoked? Also those of time,
matter, and energy? Possible, but the question is unimportant.
Matter is only a temporary means of creating time, and with it,
the mutability. When the creation was complete, the material time
could have been dispensed with, for example, when matter appeared
to be finite, but this is not the point, there is a much more
What could be the point of creating something that really
existed, when the creator Himself did not really exist? It seems
completely logical that after the self-bounding, the
self-mutation of the original ALL-consciousness into a really
existing consciousness took place that was not constrained by
contradictions. Can there be any doubt that the first aim of the
creation was the self mutation of the Creator so that he can say
The power to change that is necessary for the creation of the
goal is a self-mutating power of a consciousness that can not
exist in the infinite, only in the finite. When this creative
power could not exist in the infinite, the goal must have the
will to begin with this form of creativity. Because no difference
exists between past and future in the infinite, we can omit the
The almighty Will that created the universe must also be
infinite and exist of contradictions. Further, creativity is the
power to change something for a particular reason. First the
goal, then the Will, then the action. The same goes for the
creativity of the infinite. First came the goal, and this
motivated the almighty will that manifested IT-self in
counteractions. The will to a certain type of creativity was the
new infinity that bounded the old infinity. Since then, the Will
is irrevocable, immutable, and infinite; but creates the finite.
Because the infinite Will must consist of contradictions and
these cannot be dispensed with, IT is the not really existing for
ALL eternity, but IT is the creator of the really existing. It
is the new infinite creative power through which the goal will
come into being. The Will is the means, not the end.
"In the beginning was the Word," and only the Word.