Chapter 5: The two kinds of gravity

The binary direction of the vectors of angular momentum for the galaxies
Super massive black holes: black mirrors
The general validity for the scaling of event horizons
A scaling exercise for equilibrium black holes
The assessment of the average number of black holes in the universe
Quasars
Newton’s law of anti-gravity
The enigma of the paradox of the two out of three time-steps
Dedication for an anti-gravity experiment  

 

 

THE BINARY DIRECTION OF THE VECTORS OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM FOR THE GALAXIES

It should be possible to observe the consequences of the absolute rotation of empty space in the present day universe. So let us reconsider the galaxies. Firstly, at the start of this research the rectilinear acceleration of the quanta of empty space were considered. After some confusing struggle with the hunt for the meaning of a factor two in the scaling exercise it was discovered that empty space in our cosmos rotates in the absolute sense. Since most matter is organized in the galaxies which are in equilibrium of force with empty space, the angular momentum stored in empty space is expected to be transferred to the escaping stars beyond the equilibrium radius of the galaxies.

In some manner the engine drive of empty space transferring angular momentum to matter of the galaxies is explained. Except that the orientation for the direction of the vectors of the angular momentum for the galaxies is expected to be absolute. Meaning, all directions of the vectors should point in the same way. And naturally nature contradicts this deduction. All the directions of the vectors of angular momentum of the galaxies are distributed at random.

So a hypothesis is needed. The present day universe consisting of single normal matter was transformed due to the disappearance of conjugated matter in the early universe. The conjugated matter was transformed and absorbed by the black mirrors, super massive black holes, generating the present day galaxies.    

Probably, the quasars are the precursors for most of the present day galaxies. The super massive black mirrors (see, the super massive black holes) are the kernels for the galaxies expelling matter. Without the above hypothesis the random distribution of the direction of the angular momentum cannot be explained. It is obvious that the base for the pointing of the angular momentum of the entire galaxy is determined by the black mirrors. The polarity of the angular momentum of the macroscopic neutral flux (gravity dipole) is carried over into its g-spin of the direction of time and not at all affecting the absolute rotation of empty space, because only the overall normal matter and there fore the overall gravity determine the angular momentum of the entire universe. See, the infinity transformation of our reality to time and matter and conjugated matter.

In conclusion it looks like, that the direction of the angular momentum per galaxy with respect to the early universe can have only two positions, governed by the interference of conjugated and normal gravity during the process of the formation of the black mirrors. However due to the master mixing driven by the two kinds of gravity the tendency of empty space to rotate in the absolute sense was in process of continuous break down. It randomnized more or less the absolute binary option for the directions of the vectors of the angular momentum. The result of this process was frozen in the angular momentum of the black mirrors and to be observed in the angular momentum of the present day galaxies.   

top

 

 

                                 Chapter 5: two kinds of gravity

THE SUPER MASSIVE BLACK HOLES.

Recently new observations of galaxies about 1998, have revealed data about the super massive black holes. As well the mass of the black hole as the envelope rotation of the mass of stars around it, have been measured. It seems pretty sure that the ratio of the overall mass of the galaxy and that of the super massive black hole is around 500, while there is also a fixed relation between the average rotation velocity of the galaxy and the mass of the super massive BH. It all indicates that the galaxy and its massive centre are linked intrinsically since the beginning of their birth.

In fact the pyramid theory confirms above observations, although it is not discussed in detail, which will be corrected in a following edition.  However, according to this theory the super massive BH cannot be a single pure black hole. In the pyramid theory every black hole is a paired phenomena of a black hole generating normal gravity and a white radiator generating conjugated gravity. It has to be composed of some kind of dipole embracing both kinds of gravity. One kind generating our normal baronic matter and the conjugated gravity directed inwardly mirrored through its own singularity. In this manner the conjugated gravity cannot be matter bound to the conjugated baronic matter, but it prevents in some way the return of ejected normal matter and it represents itself as a pure immaterial field of energy and everywhere present in the empty space of our cosmos.

Earlier it was surmised that the paired phenomena (black mirror), black hole and white radiator, were physically separated entities over a long distance, but linked through the phase space of time. By the recent observations this idea had to be revised, because the two separate items of one mirror always maintain symmetry with respect to as well the normal matter as the conjugated matter, while it is not likely, one could observe the existence of conjugated matter in the present-day universe. By contracting the mirror in one physical object, consisting of a dipole of the two kinds of gravity, the evolution of the galaxies can be explained as generating normal matter from the membrane of the mirror (some kind of event horizon including intrinsic spin). It also is clear that the overall angular momentum of the inertia of the star matter around its centre is equal or of the same magnitude as the angular momentum of the black mirror itself (super massive BH). So the ratio of 500 can be explained in a classic way. It seems the pyramid theory is in agreement with the observations.

Typically, since the black mirror is a paired phenomena of two kinds of matters (gravities), it is speculated that the interaction of the g-spins of those gravities are responsible for its rotation or its intrinsic spin. Or better expressed, the intrinsic spin seems to be related to the overall generation of normal matter. Since most of the conjugated matter has disappeared in the present-day universe, the interference of matter around the mirror has changed and the emission of electromagnetic energy should be of a different frequency spectrum.

In conclusion, the black mirror can only be polarized to the universe in the one way it is observed everywhere. So it has to be concluded that it is not possible in the pyramid theory to have black holes and white radiators separately.

top  

 

 

Chapter 5: The two kinds of gravity

THE GENERAL VALIDITY FOR THE SCALING OF THE EVENT HORIZONS

The equilibrium hypothesis applied to a black hole is the condition of balance forces, one a gravity generating process and the other a quantum acceleration mechanism, suggested for a linear acceleration. A very coarse and simple point of view. It involves a mechanism of resonance that is not yet understood, but clearly such an equilibrium black hole carries angular momentum to account for its irreducible mass. This intrinsic spin complicates everything considerably, for unlike the simple definition of the event horizon (the event horizon is the radius of the black hole without spin, where light or the zero-geodesic does not return or cannot escape), the spin horizon is defined as just starting to drag the frames of reference outside the black hole. Meaning, approaching the black hole, a non rotating frame of reference, despite all effort against it, is always thrown into rotation, purely due to the angular momentum contained in the empty space, some form of curvature, around the black hole.

It seems that the equilibrium condition should be applied to the spin horizon, although not uniquely defined. However the above reasoning is valid for GRT and although one can state that the pyramid theory of quanta is equivalent to GRT, the equilibrium hypothesis should also be considered from this point of view. That is that the quanta of empty space accelerated and rotate by not following the light path or zero geodesics, when departing from the same starting point. Secondly, the discovery of the absolute rotation of empty space has consequences for the spin horizon. Thirdly, the consequence of the relative acceleration (see, the constant of relative acceleration) has to be taken into account. All these reasons point to the fact that the equilibrium black hole is not only a relativistic object in GRT, but also point to the non relativistic properties, namely organizing the quanta of empty space around the cut-off boundary for the speed of light. So it seems certainly possible that the spin horizon coincides with the radius of the equilibrium of forces. Further, only one equilibrium radius is unique, which makes the choice of the horizon obvious. The force equilibrium between gravity and the quantum mechanism of empty space, resulting in angular momentum of the black hole, makes, we hopefully stumbled on a resonance condition in exchange for the condition of equilibrium. The supposition of a resonance condition is of importance, for the interplay between conjugated and normal gravity will be better understood, but not as yet proven.

The statement is that the event horizon scaling for a rest mass or any mass, imaginary or real, based on GRT is valid for the equivalent quantum model of the accelerated empty space. In other words, one can generalise this concept op to any dimension of empty space. Up to a dimensionless constant, say fc, multiplied to the radius of the event horizon one is able to comply with the non relativistic quantum requirements. Note; the event horizon is the cut off radius for light, zero geodesic, sucked in by the black hole according to GRT.

In general the event horizon scaling together with the equilibrium equation of force, follows the usual set up.

               ab Rb1² = G Mb     and      ab Rb1² = ½ c²                     (1)

giving:

                                          c² Rb1 = 2G Mb

Where ab is the linear acceleration or quantum force to tunnel or escape from the event horizon for a mass of Mb  and  Rb1 is the cut off radius for light, the event horizon.

However all the above considerations can be short circuited by complying to the relation:

                                         ab Rb2 = ¼ c²                                     (2)

Where Rb2 is the equilibrium radius for empty space including its rotation. By replacing Rb2 for Rb1 , one can match the quantum requirements of the non relativistic condition for empty space. The end velocity of the accelerated quantum is ½ c and the end velocity for the angular momentum is ½√3c , this vector perpendicular to linear component. In that case:

                                             Rb2 = ½Rb1                                     (3)

Rb2 is, as is mentioned the quantum space horizon for the spin empty

space. Here the radius Rb2 is taken less than Rb1 and it places the spin of

the black mirror internally, which is similar to the situation of Compton’s

length. However the integration of the quantum mechanic conditions for

the horizon is complex and not resolved here.

Obviously, in any situation where the relation

                                          fc mx Mx = mpl²

is applied, the radius for the spin horizon of empty space can be matched to the equilibrium condition of the mirror mass Mx . So far this was the weakest part in the whole quantum equilibrium theory. How to comply with the requirements of GRT for the relativistic conditions near the black hole, was not understood when the whole exercise was started. The general validity of all situations in the scaling exercises of chapter 2 is resolved, which is a wonderful general conclusion.

The non-obvious is that if the condition  2mx Mx = mpl² is valid then according to the calculus ax sx = ½c² and ax Rx² = G Mx  ,always sx is equal to Rx , independent of the factor fc . The quantum wave length sx is equal to the radius Rx . This property of empty space can be called the quantum equilibrium of empty space to matter. See, the equality of  the equilibrium radius and Hubble’s distance of acceleration.

top 

 

 

 

                                 Chapter 5: The two kinds of gravity

A SCALING EXERCISE FOR THE EQUILIBRIUM OF BLACK HOLES

The continuation of the scaling exercise for the equilibrium black holes is not too difficult after the discussion and considerations of the previous section, The general validity of the scaling of event horizons. The utmost of the equilibrium condition is the quantum force acceleration of its own inertia with the self-generation of the gravity of the black hole.

          Mb ab Rb² = G Mb²      or      ab Rb² = G Mb                           (1)

Where ab is the linear acceleration of quantum exchange, applied to Newton’s law of gravity for a mass of Mb . Further is valid the quantum transformation relation

   ab fc Rb =  c²  with   fc = 4   and     ab = mb c³ / 4h;    Rb = h / mb c       (2) 

Combining both relations, gives the radius Rb , the event horizon used in the expressions for GRT, slightly different  but it is determined by the dimensionless constant fc ;           
              R
b c² = 4G Mb .

Now, the only possibility for scaling is to relate these expressions with those for the mediating mass mm or the mediating inverted (mirror) mass Mm. In that way the matching between the black hole and our reality is ensured.

                               4mm Mm = mpl²               with  fc = 4

First derivation.

Substitute:     Rb = Nb λm   ;    ab = Na aH     ;      Mb = Nb Mm     in rel. (1)

  aH Na Nb λm² = G Mm . Per definition is the equilibrium condition for Mm

            aH RM² =  G Mm      with        RM =  Npl λm    .     Then giving:

           Na Nb = Npl²           where    Npl² = Mm / mm  .

Second derivation.

  ab 4Rb = c²  :   Using previous expressions and aH = (4mm³ / mpl²)(c³ / 4h)

                       Na aH 4Nb λm = c²

                       4Na Nb (4mm³ / mpl²)(c³ / 4h)(4G Mm / c²) = c²

or        16Na Nb mm³ Mm = mpl (power 4)      or       4Na Nb mm² = mpl²

or     Na Nb = Mm /mm = Npl²       with      Npl²  =  Mm / mm = mpl² / 4mm²

Also is valid.

                 Npl² Mm = Mtot       &    Mtot = mpl (power 4) / 16mm³

    Npl Mm = Mbm = mpl³ / (8mm²)   ;    and  Npl = Nbm =  mpl / (2mm .

This shows Mm has a strong quantum link to the equilibrium black hole. The law,   Na Nb = Npl²  , shows that for any size of the black hole, the ratio Nb has always to fulfil  the middle proportionality of this relation. It is the law of Boyle and Guy Lusac, the 1st discovered gas-law of the 17th century, for the black holes.

The mean mass Mbm , where Na = Nb , has a value of 3.84*10exp(+32) kg (fc = 4) , while the Sun mass is 2*10exp(+30) kg, a factor of about two hundred smaller. The Sun mass is the minimum critical mass for the collapse of matter into a black hole after destroying the thermal equilibrium due to fusion burning according to GRT. 

Pity enough one cannot find the cut off mass, Mb, for the smallest size of the equilibrium black hole. A critical condition where the resonance situation between conjugated and normal gravity cannot be satisfied, is,  if the characteristic wavelengths for the loss less e.m. radiation cannot be contained by the dimensions of the black hole. This is called the ultra violet barrier, even if the critical wave length for e.m. radiation may be much higher than the meaning suggests.

Due to the general validity of the above law for equilibrium black holes and the predicted presence of conjugated energy field as an equivalence of gravity, no other physics mechanism for black holes in the pyramid theory are allowed. So it seems that only black mirrors exist in nature. Nor any static black holes based on the Schwartzschildt interval in GRT are possible. Unless one can prove that these are the objects for which empty space rotates around them in absolute sense. Secondly, the equilibrium condition is replaced by the resonance condition, which does not affect the scaling above.

Why is this statement valid? Although, conjugated gravity is not a state of polarisation of empty space (vacuum) coupled to normal baronic matter and cannot be observed directly, this energy field of gravity has not disappeared. It is present in the same intensity everywhere as normal gravity, but only linked through black holes. It seems that as soon as matter reaches a critical form of compression and mass, the critical intensity for conjugated resonance condition could be reached, which induces the spontaneous collapse. The mass of the stars of the red dwarfs are too small, but the mass of the Sun could be triggered into a resonance condition, possibly not spontaneously, like may be the mean mass Mbm. By speculation, Quasars, could have the mean mass at the end of the period of the early universe, partly explaining the disappearance or conversion of conjugated matter. See, the work of Denaerde, the fall of Lucifer; the Mind induced condition of the collective consciousness of an intelligent race.

Some critical note is of the order: Considering the number of Super Novas, hundreds or thousands per month observed by all kind of telescopes, from visual- to x-ray flashes or neutrinos, and associated with the collapse of black holes, the spontaneous occurrence of the resonance condition is not well understood. The next section gives Newton’s law of anti-gravity, heavily carried by the scaling exercise of this section.

 

                               Chapter 5: The two kinds of gravity

THE ASSESSMENT OF THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF BLACK HOLES IN THE UNIVERSE

The aim of this section is to estimate the average number of black mirrors in the present day universe. The statement has been made that all now a days all conjugated matter has disappeared. This can only mean that due to the conservation of energy of matter, all conjugated matter has been converted into mass energy of the black mirrors. Also it seems that these entities are the driving engines of the galaxies.

So the first supposition is that the overall conjugated energy is equal to the overall mass of normal matter in the universe. The second is that the absolute of all angular momentum represented by the black holes gives to overall angular momentum of empty space, which is the preferential rotation, so the absolute rotation of the universe.

Referring to the scaling exercise for equilibrium black holes one gets:

                     Nb Mb = Mtot     where    ωb Rb = c and ωH RH = c

Nb is not the same definition as in the previous section.

Putting in numbers:

      Mb = 10exp(+36) kg; million times Msun , gives Nb = 10exp(+17) galaxies as Mtot = 10exp(+53) kg

      Mbm = 10exp(+32) kg ,the mean mass of a BH and Nb = Npl =

10exp(+21) galaxies or BH’s.

It looks like the numbers of the calculated galaxies is much too high.

If there is one super massive BH per galaxy then the conservation of angular momentum dictates:

            ω g Rg Mg =  ωb Rb Mb                 vg Mg = c Mb                 (1)

Since the equilibrium condition for Mg and  Mtot  is valid, where vg  is also the velocity at the equilibrium radius

aH s1 = ½ vg²      aH Rg² = G Mg       vg² (Rg² / s1) = 2G Mg      

            Mtot = Ng Mg    aH RH² = G Mtot      c² RH = 2G Mtot

           vg² / c² = (Mg / Mtot) (RH s1 / Rg²) = (1 / Ng) (RH s1 / Rg²)     (2)

If the square root rule is valid then  RH = √Ng  Rg  and substitution of (1) into (2) gives:

          Mg² / Mb² = √Ng (Rg / s1)                                                       (3)

From s1 = RH  follows:  Mg = Mb

From s1 = Rg   follows:  Mg = Ng (power ¼) Mb  or:  Mtot / Mb = Ng(power 5/4)

Once above scaling seemed to work, one can try a similar approach, but instead of aH the equivalent acceleration ab independent of Rb is used.

  ab s2 = ½ vg²      ab Rg² = G Mg       vg² (Rg² / s2) = 2G Mg      

c² Rb = 2G Mb      gives    (vg² / c²) (Rg² / s2 Rb) = Mg / Mb

Or        Rg² / s2 Rb = Mg³ / Mb³                                                        (4)

However the most intriguing condition is: s = s1 = s2 , making ab = aH .

Next, after realizing again that the square root rule of (RH = √Ng Rg ) is derived from the force equilibrium equations and a valid condition, luckily enough the calculation can stay very simple. Elimination of (3) and (4) gives:

            Rg / Rb = √Ng (Mg / Mb)   or   Rg / Rb = 1/√Ng (Mtot / Mb)

Or           

            RH / Rb = (Mtot / Mb) = Nb

Using this:

            Rg / Rb = Nb / √Ng = √Ng (Mg / Mb)    or    Nb = (Ng Mg) / Mb

Which has a solution:

            Nb = Ng (power 3/2)   with s = √Ng Rb   and   Rg = √Ng s = Ng Rb

 Plugging in numbers:

            Mbm = 10exp(+32) kg;   Npl = Nb = 10exp(+21)  gives:

Ng = 10exp(+14) galaxies.

Mb = 10exp(+36) kg;     Nb = 10exp(+17)  gives:

Ng = 2.15*10exp(+11) gal.

By including the condition of rotation of all mass of the galaxy concentrated in a point around the centre, one gets:  (vg / c)³ = Rb /(2Rg)

The factor 2 is included                |   The factor 2 is neglected
                        Elimination of s in rel. (4) gives:
         s = ½ R
g                            |                 s = Rg
                                Substitution of s in rel. (3) gives:
    vg = ½√2 c Ng (power (-1/4))          |         vg = c Ng (power (-1/4))
    Mg = √2 Mb Ng (power (+1/4))       |        Mg = Mb Ng (power (+1/4)
    Rg = √2 Rb Ng (power (+3/4)           |        Rg = Rb Ng (power (+3/4)
    Nb = √2 Ng (power (+5/4))              |         Nb = Ng (power (+5/4))    
Or  N
g = ½√2 Nb(power (4/5))           |         Ng = Nb(power (4/5)) 


The result is the same as s
1= Rg in rel. (3)  !

Plugging in numbers:

            Mbm = 10exp(+32) kg;   Npl = Nb = 10exp(+21)  gives:

                                    Ng = 6.3*10exp(+16) gal.

Mb = 10exp(+36) kg;     Nb = 10exp(+17)  gives:

                                   Ng = 4.0*10exp(+13) gal.

The ball park numbers for Ng is too high with matter rotating and without the presence of a BH, but with a BH the result seems to confirm the observations, which is a pleasant surprise. This result seems also some steady state of distribution for the galaxies. Also the ratios for Mg / Mb and Rg / Rb are accordingly.

Conclusion: This calculation of s1 = s2 even shows, how aH comes into being, by taking into account the absolute angular momentum, but it still does not change the fact that the theory predicts the existence of another congruent universe to explain the overall quantum equilibrium of forces.

In the early universe the condition of ab = aH cannot be met, because no black holes are present and possibly the calculated situation of

Ng = Nb(power (4/5))  cannot be applied. In the present day universe the absolute equilibrium of empty space is stretched between two boundaries, the event horizon (acc. to GRT-definition) and infinitely far away 3D-space. Modelling the early universe is complex and it is left to computer physicists having an interest in this topic.

top 

 

 

 

                                 Chapter 5: the two kinds of gravity

QUASARS

Since the recent observations about galaxies the phenomena of the quasars can be explained by the pyramid theory. It is likely that quasars were young black mirrors or equilibrium black holes generating massive amounts of energy including huge electromagnetic radiation in the range of the radio-frequencies and well around the time our cosmos was a billion years of age.

In fact according to the theory in the early universe half the matter in the universe was normal baronic and the other half was conjugated matter, consisting out of conjugated barons and conjugated leptons, each generating their own kind of gravity, normal and conjugated. Around a billion years or less from the beginning the first black mirrors appeared, which were asymmetric to the conjugated matter, because conjugated matter is not attracted by normal gravity, but highly concentrated, it emits huge amounts of electromagnetic radiation, mostly in the low frequency range. The emission is a consequence of the interference between normal and conjugated gravity. Possibly the conjugated matter was absorbed and re-emitted as normal matter through the membrane (event horizon) composing this young black mirror, while may be the conjugated gravity shields against the re-absorption of  normal matter and also generates the intrinsic spin of the mirror.

Still some questions remain. How could the conjugated matter disappear as completely as is suggested, even if the super massive black holes have the right polarity to transfer conjugated matter in to normal matter?

Comparing quasars with super massive black mirrors in the galaxies, it is thought the are related, it seems that the older versions diminish their capacity of conjugated resonance, which is also not understood. 

top  

 

                                 Chapter 5: The two kinds of gravity

                            NEWTON’S LAW OF ANTI-GRAVITY

Newton’s law of anti-gravity is that subtle that one can easily overlook its importance. Actually, the law expressed in symbols is exactly the same as the centuries old law, but the meaning of the symbols changed completely.

Here the equilibrium is the issue again. At one distance of the radius, the opposing force of conjugated gravity, let us say, generated by a small virtual conjugated mass mc , should be balanced by the force of normal gravity. Note: Since it is proven that the pyramid theory is equivalent to GRT under certain conditions, the consequences of fc = 4 for the derivation below are taken into account. Then Newton’s law is:

        mc gc Rg² = G mc Me          or            gc Rg² = G Me                 (1)

Me is the Earth mass. gc is the gravity or the acceleration to be opposed at the surface radius Rg . The scaling exercise for the equilibrium black holes should be kept in mind to understand the simple proof.

The black hole condition for Earth is:
              c² R
be = 2G Me             (2)

With      Nbe = Me / Mm       gives:         c²(Rbe / Nbe) = 2G Mm

Where per definition:                           λm = h / mm c = 2G Mm / c²

So rel.(2) is : c² λm = 2G Mm ;    where Mm follows :     2Mm mm = mpl²  

Mm is the mirror or inverted mass of mm .

Substitution of rel.(2) into (1):       gc (Rg² / Nbe) = G Mm  

Gives:   gc (Rg² / Nbe) = ½ Rbe / Nbe      or        gc (Rg² / Nbe) = ½ λm

Or            gc Rg² = ½ λm Nbe c²      or                  gc Rg² = ½ Rbe c² 

Is this the proof? Yes, within the context of the entire discussion of all sections. The reading of the symbols is: gc is the invoked conjugated reversed impulse of interaction of certain magnitude at the distance Rg from the centre of the gravity  mass Me , generating impulses bridged by the wave length of the black hole of resonance Rbe . It should be clear by now that the interference of conjugated and normal gravity is a phenomena of resonance, requiring characteristic electro magnetic loss less waves.

In fact, due to the discovering of the law, one can feed back this information to the equilibrium condition for the black holes. The rectilinear acceleration ab giving the force balance at the event horizon is nothing more than the evoked presence of conjugated gravity, the mechanism maintaining the cosmic engines.

However, the above scaling might be alright, but something is missing. Obviously, in the expression is a dimensionless constant, as the factor half suggests. Careful analysis of the modes for the double rotating dipole in the 3D-phase space of time should give the information about the factor fc . Since it is proven that the pyramid theory is equivalent to GRT the consequences of fc = 4 are not considered here. See, the paradoxes of two or three time steps.

In the early work of the pyramid model it was already mentioned and the final consideration to understand Newton’s anti-gravity law completely. If it is possible to evoke by loss less e.m. waves the characteristic frequencies of conjugated gravity, then a boundary condition for the e.m. waves with respect to matter is required. This is the force free condition for matter. In other words, because electro magnetic energy is involved, it is necessary that the neutral matter, also generating gravity, polarizes the matter volume in the dielectrics of momentary charges and the permeability of momentary magnetic electric currents in such a way that every thing in matter is force free. Still, the resonance condition discussed in the previous section is not entirely equivalent with the force free condition for electromagnetic waves in matter. The resonance condition seems to be from one kind gravity to the other kind and via a step in between converted into the force free condition, but it should really be careful analysed. NB. The force free condition in matter is very similar to the conditions required for wave guides transporting e.m. waves nearly loss less.

top

 

                           Chapter 5: The two kinds of gravity

THE ENIGMA OF THE PARADOX OF TWO OUT OF THREE TIME STEPS

In the pyramid theory the paradox of the two out of one time step is reserved for Fermi-particles, ea. the electrons and protons or neutrons. In fact, it is already well known as the half spin particles. It is a consequence of the unfurling of the time cycle for a particle in the phase space of time. A 360-degree cycle of the particle corresponds with the 180 degrees phase cycle in our reality. In other words we miss always a phase shift of 180 degrees. In the phase space of time this hidden phase period is used to accommodate the carrier field or cosmic field of the Fermi particle.

For the macroscopic quantum generator of gravity all g-poles of the Fermi-particles (neutral) are aligned giving the overall g- pole of the macroscopic mass (equilibrium hypothesis). However the g-poles of the Fermi-particles have another time step period. It is the paradox of the one out of three time steps. Using the game of the double rotating dipole in the centre of the equilateral pyramid shows the time step cycle quickly, keeping in mind, only one pole in the animation inter phases with the mid points of the edges of the pyramid. Studying the frequency of the double rotation, only the 3 unit frequency is important for gravity, while for the conjugated gravity the 2 & 3 unit frequencies are of importance. Obviously, the right translation for the phase space of time to our reality in the design for the anti-gravity experiment is important. In this stage it is the above discussed guesses for the time step paradoxes. 

top

                          Chapter 5: The two kinds of gravity

     DEDICATION FOR AN ANTI-GRAVITY EXPERIMENT

There are many interpretations of anti-gravity floating around at the Internet. If one visits some sites there are nearly a hundred concepts of possible mechanisms to read about, of course all flawed, from less than thousand authors, who are convinced of the rightness of their ideas.

For example, one idea is worth while to highlight in the discussion. It is a design of an ‘anti-gravity’ device, but in fact a design of electrostatic levitation, here using the electrostatic field, generated by the weather machine of Earth, between the sky and Earth surface. The design is clever but has nothing to do with anti-gravity. Another idea, floating around using the weather engine, is the use of perpetual lighting discharges. There seems to be millions per hour or more for the entire planet which generate surface currents of some ringing frequencies, based on the Earth inductance and capacitance, from which one could tap energy with some kind of transformer. Another known technology is magnetic levitation, used already on trains for public transport. The magnetic levitation is not gravitational levitation.

Here, gravitational levitation is a drive of electro magnetic origin, e.m. waves probably in the hundreds of giga-hertz range, to evoke conjugated gravity, then opposing normal gravity and consequently reaching levitation. Well, it is up to the reader, cynical or not to be critical. The anti-gravity concept makes use of sound principles in physics. To the cynical reader it may seem, the author is also hiding behind the hocus pokus of the phase space of time, but it is not the intention. Of course, one cannot avoid to escape into the unexplored corners for the laws of nature to explain the entire new concept, but that is the challenge.

The contest for the design of an anti-gravity experiment is not easy, despite what already is known. Here follows an list of requirements and problems for the design of the experiment accommodating all parameters which could play a role. It is only a first step, but it could be detailed or extended by the contestants.

Newton’s law of anti-gravity shows a discrepancy between the conjugated pulse to be evoked into the Earth matter as a resonance. Namely, the characteristic parameter of Rg, the Earth surface radius and the black hole parameter, Rbe of the Earth mass. To evoke resonance, one should be concerned about the quality of the resonance cavity, which suggests the Earth volume itself. Even to generate a small conjugated reaction pulse, some considerable initial power of characteristic e.m. waves, the right mix, is required. This is why we think, the experiment will cost between 25 to 50 million dollars, euros, to accommodate the e.m. power generators.  Then of course, the design of the antenna is crucial, because it should be feasible and matched for the right mix of electro magnetic waves with adjustable phase settings and magnitudes. Consequently the detection of the reaction of the power driven pulses of e.m. energy with respect to the centre of the Earth is needed. Think in terms of sum and difference frequencies, the non linear reaction to the driving frequencies of the power plant.

So well contestants, follow the rules of the contest and enjoy yourselves with the design and  to all, every one who has an interest; SUPPORT THIS PROJECT WITH DONATIONS FOR THE PRIZE CONTEST.

top